Miranda Rights During Routine Traffic Stops: Do You Have to Speak?
If you’ve ever watched a detective show or a legal thriller, you’ve probably heard the following words: “You have the right to remain silent when questioned. Anything you say or do can and will be used against you in a court of law.” Whether or not you know them by their formal name, you are virtually guaranteed to have at least a minor degree of familiarity with your Miranda Rights. But while the opening lines of the Miranda Rights spark recognition for most people, the legal ramifications of choosing speech or silence aren’t as widely known. If you’re read your Miranda Rights during a routine traffic stop, do you have to speak? And should you?
Miranda Rights: Facts and Myths
Because of their prevalence in Hollywood creations, Miranda Rights, which are sometimes called Miranda Warnings, are plagued with misconceptions and misinformation.
Fact: If you are being held in police custody, the police must read you your Miranda Rights if they want to question you and use your responses as admissible evidence in court.
Fact: If you are not in police custody or being interrogated, your Miranda Rights do not have to be read to you.
Fact: If you have not been placed under arrest, a police officer does not have to read you your Miranda Rights, but can still use your remarks as evidence in court.
Myth: If police officers do not read you your Miranda Rights, the charges against you will be thrown out in court. The only scenario in which evidence becomes inadmissible due to a failure to read the Miranda Rights is one in which the victim was held in custody and questioned by law enforcement.
Miranda Rights and Traffic Stops
The two basic conditions that require a reading of your Miranda Rights are:
- Being held in police custody.
- Being interrogated by the police.
If you have been halted for a routine traffic stop, you are obviously neither in custody nor under interrogation. Therefore, the police do not have to read your Miranda Rights, and anything you say can be still used against you in court. So how much — or how little — should you reveal to the officer making the stop?
Every U.S. citizen’s “right to silence” is upheld under the Fifth Amendment. This right to silence guarantees that, unless the officer has probable cause for suspicion (e.g. injuries resulting from an assault, erratic driving under the influence of narcotics), you do not have to answer any questioning. However, traffic stops are an exception to the right to silence.
During a traffic stop, it is customary for the police to ask stopped drivers for their identification, usually in the form of your driver’s license and vehicle registration. The officer may ask questions related to the stop (e.g. asking why you were going so fast if you were speeding). In most scenarios, you could simply invoke the right of silence and ask to speak with a lawyer. However, if a driver refuses to speak during a traffic stop, they may find themselves in violation of “failure to make identity known,” which can lead to an arrest.
The bottom line is this: you should always be polite and courteous to police officers you interact with. If the worst happens, a cooperative attitude can help you later in court. However, while you should be respectful and compliant, you should avoid giving out any information beyond what you are explicitly asked about. If you do speak to the police during a traffic stop or other routine matter, you should be aware that unless you are being interrogated and held in custody, your Miranda Rights do not have to be read to you — and that doesn’t mean your answers to questions “don’t count,” either.
If you have been stopped for a New Jersey or Pennsylvania traffic violation, the defense attorneys at Young, Marr & Associates handle matters involving speeding tickets, license suspensions, moving violations, reckless driving, and DUI/DWI. Contact us online right away to schedule a free consultation with a traffic violation lawyer.
NO JAIL TIME
Commonwealth v. "H" (DUI case)
Client was charged with three separate DUI cases calling for mandatory minimum imprisonment of 90 days on each case. Client was advised to seek immediate intensive alcohol counseling. Client was sentenced to 1 year of house arrest after serving 3 days in the county prison.
Commonwealth v. "C" (Felony drug/Firearms case)
Client was charged with felony Delivery of drugs and illegal gun possession and was facing a mandatory 3-6 year prison sentence in the State prison system. Client was sentenced to one year of house arrest.
Commonwealth v. "S"
Client was charged with simple assault, domestic. After a hearing where evidence and testimony was presented, the entire case was dismissed by Judge Leonard Brown.
State of New Jersey v. "H"
Charges for young man charged with second degree aggravated assault were downgraded to third degree and he was accepted into the County Pretrial Intervention program with charges to be dismissed and record expunged after one year of misconduct free behavior.
OUR CRIMINAL DEFENSE TEAM INCLUDES TWO FORMER DISTRICT ATTORNEYS
We have decades of experience dealing with local police departments, prosecutors, and judges throughout southeastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
Anyone facing charges involving a criminal offense can expect to experience a heightened degree of emotional turmoil, for themselves, as well as their family members. Our team of highly qualified criminal law attorneys and expert legal support staff are committed to providing each of our client’s with the compassion and understanding they deserve, as well as an aggressive plan for representation at an affordable price.
As former prosecutors, we have a balanced and in-depth understanding of the criminal justice system and how the prosecution prepares cases. In addition, we have long-standing experience dealing with local police departments, prosecutors and judges throughout southeastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
At Young, Marr and Associates, when we say “experience matters,” we mean it. Our lawyers, which include two former prosecutors and a former senior deputy district attorney bring more than three decades of criminal law experience, handling more than 10,000 criminal cases. It is precisely that experience that allows us to achieve outstanding results for our clients facing DUI, traffic, felony and misdemeanor charges in state, federal and juvenile courts.