Young Marr remains dedicated to our clients during this COVID-19 quarantine. We understand that legal needs of our clients must go on during this time. In order to minimize disruption as much as possible, we are offering free consultations via phone and/or video and can have our clients submit documents virtually.

Does Pennsylvania Have “Stand Your Ground” Laws?

There’s no question that Stand Your Ground laws are a divisive topic, particularly due to their role in the Trayvon Martin-George Zimmerman shooting of 2012.  Critics have called them “shoot first” laws, while supporters argue they help keep innocent people out of prison.  While Stand Your Ground laws are somewhat controversial, they can be significant to criminal defendants charged with assault or homicide.  It’s important for defendants to be aware of the rules and restrictions that apply to Pennsylvania’s Stand Your Ground laws, and how they can potentially impact the outcome of a case.

What is a “Stand Your Ground” Law?

Stand Your Ground laws are relatively recent in the U.S., with Florida passing the first just 10 years ago in 2005.  Since then, 23 other states have followed suit — including Pennsylvania.

Pennsylvania’s Stand Your Ground provisions can be found in 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. §505(b)(2.3), which states the following:

An actor who is not engaged in a criminal activity, who is not in illegal possession of a firearm and who is attacked in any place where the actor would have a duty to retreat under paragraph (2)(ii) has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his ground and use force, including deadly force.

However, in order for the above paragraph to apply, the person (“actor”) must:

  • Have had the legal right to be where he or she was at the time.  (If the actor was committing burglary, for example, these rights would not apply.)
  • Have been operating under the reasonable belief that using force, including deadly force, was “immediately necessary… to protect… against death, serious bodily injury, kidnapping or sexual intercourse by force or threat.”  This “immediate necessity” for self-defense means the harm or threatened harm must have been imminent.

It’s important to elaborate on the term “serious bodily injury,” which has a specific legal meaning.  As defined by 055 Pa. Code §3490.4, a serious bodily injury is one which either:

  • “Creates a substantial risk of death.”
  • “Causes serious permanent disfigurement.”
  • “[Causes] protracted loss or impairment of the function of a body member or organ.”

Stand Your Ground laws do not cover bodily injury, or injury which causes only “impairment of physical condition or substantial pain.”  While each injury must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, a broken finger or minor laceration would likely be considered bodily injury, while something like loss of limb or severing an artery would be considered serious bodily injury.

This distinction can also impact how a defendant is criminally charged.  For example, causing bodily injury generally leads to simple assault charges, while causing serious bodily injury can raise the charges to aggravated assault.

In addition to the defendant meeting certain criteria, the attacker, kidnapper, etc. must have either used or been armed with:

  • A real gun.
  • An imitation gun.
  • “Any other weapon readily or apparently capable of lethal use,” such as knives.  This firearm (or other weapon) must be visible to the defendant.  This particular criteria distinguishes Pennsylvania’s Stand Your Ground laws from Florida’s, which do not carry this prerequisite.

PA State Map 1024x637 - Does Pennsylvania Have "Stand Your Ground" Laws?

Stand Your Ground Laws and Use of Deadly Force

These laws also carry some restrictions which can be significant for homicide and assault defendants.  In accordance with 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. §505(2), the use of deadly force is not considered to be legally justifiable unless the person was defending him- or herself “against death, serious bodily injury, kidnapping or sexual intercourse.”  Deadly force is also not permissible if the defendant:

  • Provoked the other person.
  • Knew he or she could retreat “with complete safety.”

However, the defendant is not obliged to retreat from his or her home or workplace, unless the defendant either:

  • Provoked the attack or threat.
  • Was attacked by a known coworker at his or her workplace.

This concept of having no duty to retreat in one’s own home is known as the “castle doctrine” (sometimes called “defense of habitation law” or “castle law”), an ancient holdover from the Roman Empire.

Exceptions to the duty to retreat, such as those described above, do not apply in cases where the defendant was acting against an on-duty police officer whom the defendant knew (or should have known) to be an officer.

While the root concepts are similar, Stand Your Ground is not synonymous with traditional self-defense.  As discussed above, Stand Your Ground arises only under very specific sets of circumstances, whereas self-defense has a much broader application.  For example, self-defense can arise even in cases where the attacker did not visibly possess a gun or other dangerous weapon.

Pennsylvania Criminal Defense Attorneys Offering Free Consultations

If you or someone you love has been charged with a misdemeanor or felony offense in Pennsylvania or New Jersey, the experienced criminal defense lawyers of Young, Marr & Associates may be able to help.  To arrange for a free and completely confidential legal consultation, call our law offices right away at (609) 755-3115 in New Jersey or (215) 701-6519 in Pennsylvania.



icon car - Criminal Defense

Learn what to do if you have been stopped for DUI/DWI.

icon car - Criminal Defense

If this is your first DUI offense, you may be eligible for ARD.



Commonwealth v. "H" (DUI case)

Client was charged with three separate DUI cases calling for mandatory minimum imprisonment of 90 days on each case. Client was advised to seek immediate intensive alcohol counseling. Client was sentenced to 1 year of house arrest after serving 3 days in the county prison.


Commonwealth v. "C" (Felony drug/Firearms case)

Client was charged with felony Delivery of drugs and illegal gun possession and was facing a mandatory 3-6 year prison sentence in the State prison system. Client was sentenced to one year of house arrest.


Commonwealth v. "S"

Client was charged with simple assault, domestic. After a hearing where evidence and testimony was presented, the entire case was dismissed by Judge Leonard Brown.


State of New Jersey v. "H"

Charges for young man charged with second degree aggravated assault were downgraded to third degree and he was accepted into the County Pretrial Intervention program with charges to be dismissed and record expunged after one year of misconduct free behavior.


We have decades of experience dealing with local police departments, prosecutors, and judges throughout southeastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Anyone facing charges involving a criminal offense can expect to experience a heightened degree of emotional turmoil, for themselves, as well as their family members. Our team of highly qualified criminal law attorneys and expert legal support staff are committed to providing each of our client’s with the compassion and understanding they deserve, as well as an aggressive plan for representation at an affordable price.

As former prosecutors, we have a balanced and in-depth understanding of the criminal justice system and how the prosecution prepares cases. In addition, we have long-standing experience dealing with local police departments, prosecutors and judges throughout southeastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

At Young, Marr and Associates, when we say “experience matters,” we mean it. Our lawyers, which include two former prosecutors and a former senior deputy district attorney bring more than three decades of criminal law experience, handling more than 10,000 criminal cases. It is precisely that experience that allows us to achieve outstanding results for our clients facing DUI, traffic, felony and misdemeanor charges in state, federal and juvenile courts.