Defending DUI Cases Also Involving Prescription Or Illegal Drugs
Interviewer: What percentage of the cases you handle involve alcohol versus drugs- either prescription or illegal?
Ellis: The majority are alcohol-related. If I had to put a percentage on it, probably at least 75% of my cases are alcohol cases. We get cases where people get pulled over for having too much prescription medication in their system.
Either they took too much; or they are prescribed a very high amount and perhaps should not be driving. We also see situations routinely where people taking prescription medication have a couple of drinks on top of that, which intensifies the effect.
Interviewer: You can be charged with DUI for illegal drugs like marijuana or cocaine. What happens with prescription drugs such as Oxycontin?
Ellis: If you had so much in your system that you are impaired by that medication, then you could certainly be charged and found guilty of driving under the influence of the prescribed medication.
If it is illegal narcotics, pretty much any amount in your system, you are automatically going to be a DUI. With prescription medication, they look at what they call the “therapeutic level.”
There is a generally recognized level. If somebody is taking a prescribed amount of Percocet, just to give you an example, there should be “X” amount in your system. If there is more than that, then you are deemed to be under the influence of that medication and unable to drive.
I see a lot of those with people who have had long-term injuries, who have been on heavy-duty narcotics for a long period of time. They build up a tolerance, and they are taking high dosages.
A lot of times, they say to me, “Well, my doctor prescribed this amount. I am taking the right amount.” The law says you should not be driving with that amount in your system.
I have seen a lot of cases too with people on Ambien sleeping medication. They cannot sleep at night. They still have some in their system when they drive the next morning. They get into an accident, and lo and behold it comes back there is too much in their system.
A lot of these people are first-time offenders with too much medication. A lot of times, we are able to get the ARD program so they do not have to go to jail or have a record.
Interviewer: Are drug related DUI cases easier or harder to defend compared to DUI cases involving just alcohol?
Ellis: DUI blood test results usually are what they are. They are not that easy to fight. Usually the common defense for any type of DUI, whether it is alcohol or drugs, is probable cause for the stop.
Does the police officer have enough in his mind when he puts on his lights to pull you over, to stop you? That is typically the defense. That is handled with a suppression motion, pretrial, where the prosecution has to prove to the judge there is probable cause to pull the motorist over.
If there is not probable cause, then the case would be suppressed and dismissed. If there is probable cause, then they would be able to proceed. However, with blood test results, all the police have to do is prove it was taken within two hours of when the person drove, and it was taken by an accredited hospital.
Then, they just have to prove the chain of custody, that the blood tested was in fact this motorist’s blood.
We go to suppression in DUI cases when a judge says, “I agree with defense. I am not going to allow that evidence in.” The case is suppressed. That is the greatest feeling in the world.
This is because the man or woman sitting next to me is usually just a regular person who, for whatever circumstance, got in a bit of trouble. They are just regular people who made a mistake. That usually is very gratifying when we can get a case dismissed.
NO JAIL TIME
Commonwealth v. "H" (DUI case)
Client was charged with three separate DUI cases calling for mandatory minimum imprisonment of 90 days on each case. Client was advised to seek immediate intensive alcohol counseling. Client was sentenced to 1 year of house arrest after serving 3 days in the county prison.
Commonwealth v. "C" (Felony drug/Firearms case)
Client was charged with felony Delivery of drugs and illegal gun possession and was facing a mandatory 3-6 year prison sentence in the State prison system. Client was sentenced to one year of house arrest.
Commonwealth v. "S"
Client was charged with simple assault, domestic. After a hearing where evidence and testimony was presented, the entire case was dismissed by Judge Leonard Brown.
State of New Jersey v. "H"
Charges for young man charged with second degree aggravated assault were downgraded to third degree and he was accepted into the County Pretrial Intervention program with charges to be dismissed and record expunged after one year of misconduct free behavior.
OUR CRIMINAL DEFENSE TEAM INCLUDES TWO FORMER DISTRICT ATTORNEYS
We have decades of experience dealing with local police departments, prosecutors, and judges throughout southeastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
Anyone facing charges involving a criminal offense can expect to experience a heightened degree of emotional turmoil, for themselves, as well as their family members. Our team of highly qualified criminal law attorneys and expert legal support staff are committed to providing each of our client’s with the compassion and understanding they deserve, as well as an aggressive plan for representation at an affordable price.
As former prosecutors, we have a balanced and in-depth understanding of the criminal justice system and how the prosecution prepares cases. In addition, we have long-standing experience dealing with local police departments, prosecutors and judges throughout southeastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
At Young, Marr and Associates, when we say “experience matters,” we mean it. Our lawyers, which include two former prosecutors and a former senior deputy district attorney bring more than three decades of criminal law experience, handling more than 10,000 criminal cases. It is precisely that experience that allows us to achieve outstanding results for our clients facing DUI, traffic, felony and misdemeanor charges in state, federal and juvenile courts.