Close Menu
Young, Marr, Mallis & Associates
Schedule A Complimentary Consultation 215-639-5297
Home / Lehigh County, PA Drug Crimes Defense Lawyer

Lehigh County, PA Drug Crimes Defense Lawyer

A drug charge can begin with a simple traffic stop, a search of a vehicle, an investigation into alleged activity at a residence, or even an accusation involving prescription medication. Regardless of how the case begins, the consequences can be serious. A conviction for a drug offense may result in jail or prison time, significant fines, a criminal record, loss of employment opportunities, professional licensing issues, and other long-term consequences.

Drug cases also often involve complicated legal and factual questions. Was the search lawful? Did police have probable cause? Did the defendant actually possess the substance? Was the substance properly tested? Does the evidence support an allegation of personal possession, or is the prosecution attempting to claim an intent to distribute?

If you are facing drug charges in Lehigh County, the decisions you make early in the case matter. Speaking with investigators, consenting to searches, or accepting a plea offer without fully understanding the consequences can affect your ability to pursue the strongest defense.

At Young, Marr, Mallis & Associates, our Lehigh County Drug Crime Defense Lawyers represent individuals accused of drug offenses throughout the Lehigh Valley. Our attorneys include former prosecutors who understand how narcotics investigations are conducted and how prosecutors build drug cases. We combine that knowledge with aggressive defense advocacy to challenge the evidence, protect our clients’ rights, and pursue the best possible outcome.

Drug Cases Often Depend on Evidence Collected Before an Arrest

Many drug prosecutions are built around evidence obtained before a person is ever charged.

Law enforcement may rely on:

  • Traffic stops.
  • Vehicle searches.
  • Search warrants.
  • Surveillance.
  • Confidential informants.
  • Controlled purchases.
  • Electronic communications.
  • Financial records.

Because so much of a drug case depends on how evidence was obtained, one of the first steps in building a defense is examining whether police followed constitutional requirements.

The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. If law enforcement violated those protections, evidence obtained during an illegal search may be challenged in court.

Understanding Controlled Substances Under Pennsylvania Law

Pennsylvania regulates controlled substances through the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, which classifies drugs into different schedules based on factors such as accepted medical use, potential for abuse, and risk of dependence.

The scheduling system affects how offenses are charged and the potential penalties involved.

Controlled substances are generally divided into five schedules:

  • Schedule I substances are considered to have a high potential for abuse and no currently accepted medical use under federal standards.
  • Schedule II substances may have accepted medical uses but also carry significant abuse potential.
  • Schedule III, IV, and V substances generally involve progressively lower levels of abuse potential and restrictions.

The classification of the alleged substance can have a major impact on the severity of the charge and the potential consequences of a conviction.

Drug Charges Range From Misdemeanors to Serious Felonies

Not every drug charge is prosecuted the same way. The severity of the offense depends on numerous factors, including the type and amount of substance involved, the allegations made by prosecutors, and the defendant’s prior record.

Common drug charges include:

  • Possession of a controlled substance.
  • Possession with intent to deliver.
  • Drug delivery.
  • Manufacturing controlled substances.
  • Prescription drug offenses.
  • Possession of drug paraphernalia.
  • Drug conspiracy allegations.

A possession charge involving a small amount of a controlled substance presents very different issues from an allegation that someone participated in a large-scale distribution operation.

The defense strategy must reflect those differences.

Possession Cases Require Proof of Knowledge and Control

In order to obtain a conviction for possession, prosecutors generally must prove that the defendant knowingly possessed a controlled substance.

Possession does not always mean that drugs were found directly on a person. Pennsylvania recognizes both actual possession and constructive possession.

Actual possession generally means that the substance was found on the person or within their immediate physical control.

Constructive possession involves allegations that a person had the ability and intent to control the substance, even if it was not physically on them. These cases can become complicated when multiple people have access to the location where drugs are found.

For example, if police discover drugs in a shared residence or vehicle, prosecutors must still prove that the accused person—not someone else—knowingly possessed them.

Possession With Intent to Deliver Requires More Than Possession

One of the most serious drug allegations is possession with intent to deliver, commonly called PWID.

A possession with intent charge requires prosecutors to prove more than the presence of drugs. The Commonwealth must establish that the defendant intended to deliver or distribute the controlled substance.

Prosecutors may rely on evidence such as:

  • The amount of the substance.
  • Packaging materials.
  • Scales.
  • Cash.
  • Communications.
  • Alleged customer information.
  • Statements made during an investigation.

However, these factors do not automatically establish guilt. An experienced defense attorney examines whether the evidence truly supports the prosecution’s theory.

Challenging Confidential Informants and Controlled Purchases

Confidential informants are frequently used in drug investigations. While informants may provide important information, their reliability must be carefully evaluated.

Questions may include:

  • Does the informant have a criminal record?
  • Did the informant receive benefits for cooperating?
  • Has the informant provided reliable information in the past?
  • Was the controlled purchase properly conducted?
  • Are there inconsistencies in the informant’s statements?

Because informants often have their own motivations, their credibility can become a significant issue in a drug case.

Drug Convictions Can Affect Your Future in Lehigh County

The consequences of a drug conviction may extend far beyond the sentence imposed by the court.

Depending on the circumstances, a conviction may affect:

  • Employment opportunities.
  • Professional licenses.
  • Housing applications.
  • Educational opportunities.
  • Immigration status.
  • Firearm rights.

For professionals, students, and individuals seeking future opportunities, avoiding or minimizing the impact of a conviction may be just as important as avoiding incarceration.

A Defense Strategy Built Around Your Goals

Every drug case presents different challenges.

Some clients may benefit from challenging the legality of a search. Others may have defenses involving possession, intent, identification, or the reliability of government witnesses. In certain situations, diversionary programs or negotiated resolutions may provide alternatives to a conviction.

At Young, Marr, Mallis & Associates, we take the time to understand each client’s circumstances and goals. We explain available options, identify strengths and weaknesses in the case, and help clients make informed decisions about how to proceed.

Experience Matters in Serious Drug Cases

Drug prosecutions can involve complicated statutes, technical evidence, and aggressive law enforcement tactics. Having attorneys who understand both prosecution strategies and defense options can make a meaningful difference.

Our former prosecutors understand how prosecutors evaluate drug cases because they have been involved in that process. That perspective allows us to anticipate arguments, identify weaknesses, and prepare effective defenses.

Whether a case is resolved through negotiation or proceeds to trial, we are prepared to advocate for our clients.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between drug possession and possession with intent to deliver in Pennsylvania?

Drug possession generally involves knowingly possessing a controlled substance. Possession with intent to deliver requires additional proof that the person intended to distribute or deliver the substance to another person. Prosecutors often rely on circumstances such as quantity, packaging, communications, and other evidence to support an intent-to-deliver allegation.

Can police search my car or home for drugs without a warrant?

Sometimes. Pennsylvania and federal law recognize certain exceptions to the warrant requirement, but police must have legal justification before conducting a search. If a search violated constitutional protections, an attorney may be able to challenge the admissibility of the evidence.

What are the different drug schedules in Pennsylvania?

Pennsylvania classifies controlled substances into five schedules. The schedule assigned to a substance reflects factors such as medical use and potential for abuse. The schedule can affect how a drug offense is charged and the penalties associated with a conviction.

Can I be charged with drug possession if the drugs were not found on me?

Yes. Prosecutors may pursue charges based on constructive possession, which requires proof that the defendant knowingly had the ability and intent to control the substance. These cases often involve disputes about ownership, access, and knowledge.

What happens if drugs are found during a search warrant?

A search warrant does not automatically prove guilt. The defense can examine whether police had probable cause to obtain the warrant, whether the warrant was properly executed, and whether the evidence actually connects the accused person to the alleged offense.

Call Young, Marr, Mallis & Associates for a Free Consultation

If you are facing drug charges in Lehigh County, do not wait to seek experienced legal representation. Drug cases can involve complex constitutional issues, scientific evidence, and serious consequences that may affect your future for years. At Young, Marr, Mallis & Associates, our former prosecutors and experienced criminal defense attorneys understand how drug investigations are built and how to challenge the government’s case. We are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to help. Call today for a free consultation and let us begin protecting your rights, your freedom, and your future.

Our Office Locations
Pennsylvania
Bensalem, PA
3554 Hulmeville Ave., Suite 102
Bensalem PA 19020
215-639-5297
Philadelphia, PA
7909 Bustletown Ave., 1st Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19152
215-607-7478
Bala Cynwyd, PA
2 Bala Plaza, Suite 300
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
610-557-3209
Easton, PA
101 Larry Holmes Dr. #212
Easton, PA 18042
215-515-7077
Quakertown, PA
328 Broad St.
Quakertown, PA 18951
215-515-6876
Allentown, PA
137 N 5th St. Suite A
Allentown, PA 18102
215-240-4082
Jenkintown, PA
135 Old York Road
Jenkintown, PA 19046
215-544-3347
Plymouth Meeting, PA
600 W. Germantown Pike #400
Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462
215-515-6876
Harrisburg, PA
2225 Sycamore St.
Harrisburg, PA 17111
717-864-8887
New Jersey
Cinnaminson, NJ
909 Route 130 South #202
Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
609-796-4344
Piscataway, NJ
200 Centennial Ave., Suite 200
Piscataway, NJ 08854
908-367-7256
Hamilton TWP., NJ
3525 Quakerbridge Rd. #903
Hamilton Township, NJ 08619
609-236-8649
Marlton, NJ
10000 Lincoln Drive E, Suite 201
Marlton, NJ 08053
856-213-2805