Philadelphia Marijuana Possession Lawyer

While some states have moved to legalize marijuana, in the state of Pennsylvania it is still considered a controlled substance and a crime to be in its possession.

Each year, every Philadelphia marijuana possession lawyer deals with hundreds of cases of marijuana possession. While national attitudes have relaxed some, any time you are facing a drug possession charge, you need to make sure you are properly represented.

Drug Sentencing Guidelines for Marijuana Charges in Philadelphia, PA

Drug charges typically have mandatory minimum sentences, so you could wind up losing your freedom for an extended period of time if you are not properly represented in court.

These sentences take into account many factors that determine their length and harshness. If you have been arrested and charged with possession of marijuana, your best course of action is to have a Philadelphia marijuana possession lawyer represent you so all the nuances of the case can be properly explored.

Even the simple possession of marijuana has a mandatory minimum sentence of thirty days to one year in prison, depending on how much marijuana you were caught with. This is in addition to a fine of $500–$5,000. Avoiding these minimum mandatory sentences is what makes it so crucial to work with a Philadelphia marijuana possession lawyer from the beginning.

Defenses to Marijuana Possession

In order for the prosecution to get a conviction, they have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you had intent, knowledge, sufficient quantity of the drug, that the marijuana was not prescribed by a medical doctor, and that the drugs belonged to you.  The conviction of any drug possession charge requires evidence that the defendant is guilty of certain key criteria. Your Philadelphia marijuana possession lawyer will attempt to ensure the “beyond a reasonable doubt” criterion is not met in the following areas:

  1. That the defendant had actual control or possession of the drug.
  2. That the defendant knew the drug was an illegal controlled substance.
  3. That the defendant knowingly and intentionally had possession of a controlled substance and did not have a valid prescription for said substance.

Your Philadelphia marijuana possession lawyer will examine the prosecution’s evidence and either move to have certain evidence excluded or present evidence and counterarguments that create sufficient reasonable doubt.

In order to exclude evidence, the constitutionality of the search conducted by law enforcement will have to be questioned. The police will need to have had either probable cause or a search warrant before any search and seizure. Otherwise, any evidence seized during the search could be ruled inadmissible and result in the case being dismissed outright.

Schedule a Consultation with a Philadelphia Marijuana Possession Lawyer

Marijuana is often viewed as a less serious drug, but being charged and convicted for its possession is serious enough. If you are facing trial for marijuana possession, speak with a Philadelphia marijuana possession lawyer from Young, Marr & Associates.

Contact us by calling (215) 701-6519 and arrange a time for a free case evaluation. Hiring one of our attorneys could be the best decision you make for your case.

HOW WE CAN HELP

DUI DEFENSE

icon car - Criminal Defense
DUI INFORMATION CENTER

Learn what to do if you have been stopped for DUI/DWI.

icon car - Criminal Defense
ARD IN PENNSYLVANIA

If this is your first DUI offense, you may be eligible for ARD.

RESULTS

NO JAIL TIME

Commonwealth v. "H" (DUI case)

Client was charged with three separate DUI cases calling for mandatory minimum imprisonment of 90 days on each case. Client was advised to seek immediate intensive alcohol counseling. Client was sentenced to 1 year of house arrest after serving 3 days in the county prison.

CASE DISMISSED

Commonwealth v. "C" (Felony drug/Firearms case)

Client was charged with felony Delivery of drugs and illegal gun possession and was facing a mandatory 3-6 year prison sentence in the State prison system. Client was sentenced to one year of house arrest.

CASE DISMISSED

Commonwealth v. "S"

Client was charged with simple assault, domestic. After a hearing where evidence and testimony was presented, the entire case was dismissed by Judge Leonard Brown.

CASE DISMISSED

State of New Jersey v. "H"

Charges for young man charged with second degree aggravated assault were downgraded to third degree and he was accepted into the County Pretrial Intervention program with charges to be dismissed and record expunged after one year of misconduct free behavior.

OUR CRIMINAL DEFENSE TEAM INCLUDES TWO FORMER DISTRICT ATTORNEYS

We have decades of experience dealing with local police departments, prosecutors, and judges throughout southeastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Anyone facing charges involving a criminal offense can expect to experience a heightened degree of emotional turmoil, for themselves, as well as their family members. Our team of highly qualified criminal law attorneys and expert legal support staff are committed to providing each of our client’s with the compassion and understanding they deserve, as well as an aggressive plan for representation at an affordable price.

As former prosecutors, we have a balanced and in-depth understanding of the criminal justice system and how the prosecution prepares cases. In addition, we have long-standing experience dealing with local police departments, prosecutors and judges throughout southeastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

At Young, Marr and Associates, when we say “experience matters,” we mean it. Our lawyers, which include two former prosecutors and a former senior deputy district attorney bring more than three decades of criminal law experience, handling more than 10,000 criminal cases. It is precisely that experience that allows us to achieve outstanding results for our clients facing DUI, traffic, felony and misdemeanor charges in state, federal and juvenile courts.